1. Shaun Clark
    January 26, 2020 @ 10:16 am


  2. bob robertson
    January 26, 2020 @ 10:49 am

    The constitution is very clear and unambiguous on the justification of removal of a president of the US, it is for a high crime, or misdemeanor,. A misdemeanor has three levels, A, B, and C, whereas a high crime is at the very top of the list. It suggest the level of crime starts from a class C misdemeanor (C being the least level of the three) the lowest level of crime, the point where criminality charges begin (whereas if convicted may include a jail sentence), all the way through to include those classifications, and levels of charges leading all the way to the top of the list to the highest level, and classifies the highest level being bribery, and or treason. Being it must be “crime” it can be argued whether it must be a crime listed in the U.S. code (statute), or in the criminal code of a state whereas the alleged criminal conduct occurred, or criminal like conduct, however nearly every configuration of criminal conduct has already been codified, and I am not persuaded it includes “criminal like conduct”, or crimes known to be remedied in civil courts. Criminally charging someone for “criminal like conduct” in a criminal action alone is too arbitrary and vague, it is a matter that would ordinarily be tried in the civil courts, usually in liability suits, or under contract law. Most law professors have no trial advocacy experience, and I caution anyone to take them too seriously.. The founding fathers of this government did not intend the removal of a president for criminal civil matters, only those crimes that are known to be tried in criminal courts, criminal conduct under the common law can be decided by a jury, the problem is the sentencing is held in a hearing post conviction in a proceeding in equity, hence since the president is in the executive branch of government which serves an administrative function, and during such case he is tried under article 1 by another branch of government who has administrative functions under article 1 , it is impossible to try the president under the common law, (so he can not be charged with a common law criminal violation), the impeachment proceedings must remain in equity, since this is the case the charge must also be in equity, and the charge of a violation of a criminal statute that has first been adopted by an agency. Statutes are not laws, agencies have been created to adopt statutes into their policies that give the statutes “writs” the force and effect of law,,, simply stating the president violated a statute is not enough, they must first show the statute was adopted by an agency with authority to enforce it, and the party bringing forth the action has the authority to enforce it on behalf of that agency… This has not yet been done and I do not think anyone in congress or the law professors are aware of this…IN a nut shell congress does not have the jurisdiction to charge anyone not even the POTUS for a criminal violation under the common law, nor standing to try the case including impeachment trials for a criminal violation of the common law..

    • trafficjon400
      January 27, 2020 @ 12:21 am

      Any one figure out what said by your comment yet and why not”. Sure interesting. also have not herd it put this way” as little as i know.

  3. Glenn Knapp
    January 26, 2020 @ 11:00 am

    Whoever can’t see that Trump is dubious and unintelligent, you are either in denial or uncapable of logical thinking. It’s truly saddening and I hope you all educate yourself on his actions.

    • dewsterman
      January 26, 2020 @ 10:28 pm

      Yeah, your minion Pelosi handing out souvenir pens during the “solemn” impeachment of our president tells me all I need to know about their corrupt motives.

  4. bob robertson
    January 26, 2020 @ 11:02 am

    The constitution provides that “in ALL criminal “proceedings” (it does not specifically state criminal judicial proceedings, or exclude congressional proceedings) it says in all criminal proceedings the accused shall (shall means must) have the right to confront his accuser. The whistle blower filed a whistle blower criminal complaint accusing the president of criminal conduct that means the whistle blower is the very accuser named in the constitution which the president has the right to confront, so why is the president not able to confront his accuser?

  5. tphillip66
    January 26, 2020 @ 11:12 am

    We are now and have been lied to by our media and by our politicians. “Enemy of the people” is an apt description for what is happening in our world. For the past 5-6 years Conservatives and Republicans have a slim advantage in general truth telling, ie. Immigration, China, crime, the economy. It can be squandered very easily. Democrats have lost my trust about 15 yrs ago. I have yet to see any reason they have earned it back.

    • trafficjon400
      January 27, 2020 @ 12:04 am

      Same o same oh”. Putting it in other words same meaning. it just continues no matter what. time will tell.

  6. Cesar
    January 26, 2020 @ 11:12 am

    The people involved in trying to remove President Trump, are trying to stop him from exposing the crimes and corruption that they’re involved with.

    • Jim Ellis
      January 28, 2020 @ 8:39 pm

      @Papa Stalin no, we did not “lose” in Vietnam. We were ordered to leave. It was politics, not defeat. You’re too young to know. Read a book.

    • Papa Stalin
      January 28, 2020 @ 8:41 pm

      @Jim Ellis You’re too brainwashed. You were ordered to leave because you we’re getting your asses kicked. You set forests on fire and still lost.

    • Jim Ellis
      January 28, 2020 @ 8:47 pm

      @Papa Stalin bible? Haven’t been to church in about 50 years. You really should quit this discussion, and go to bed as you said. Nah. You can’t. You have to get in the last word so you can go to bed feeling confident.

    January 26, 2020 @ 11:59 am

    Politics in its very nature is a quid pro quo. Businesses give contributions to parties for the very same thing. There is nothing wrong with what Trump did. He’s the president and has the power to do that. What’s really disturbing is that the democrat’s thing they’re serving the people working so hard over the last three years to reverse the choice of the people. President will again, just because of the Dems actions.

  8. Cora Dailay
    January 26, 2020 @ 12:11 pm

    REPUBLICANS keep SENATE and TAKE back HOUSE SPEAKERSHIP 🇺🇸🇺🇸💞❤️💜❤️💞🇺🇸🇺🇸✌️✌️✌️.
    IMPEACHMENT HOAX by DEMOCRATS to COVER UP Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Hillary, John Kerry et. al. They lied to the American people over and over 😑😑
    TRUMP Defense Counsel Team are SMART and INTELLIGENT, they DISMANTLED with FACTS supported by the Constitution, Due Process, Executive Privilege and Separation of Power in 2 hours the 3days Argument of DEMOCRATS. No Lies just Facts. Thank you so much for True Patriots Lawyers.

  9. Jenn smith
    January 26, 2020 @ 12:15 pm

    Thank Christ, it’s all over but the shouting…..Trump acquitted, democrats go down in flames.

    • Jenn smith
      January 26, 2020 @ 6:37 pm

      @spiro revelis
      we’ve had flash floods before.
      we’ve even had melting democrat snowflakes before but it’s always fun to watch.

  10. Cheryl Gaston
    January 26, 2020 @ 1:23 pm

    What a terriable performance,these lawyers shoulda have stood home,and pat cipellone shoulda have recused his self from this trial bc hes in the LOOP as well

  11. trimntim
    January 26, 2020 @ 1:33 pm

    Two hour defense squashes three years of “Unlawful Persecution” by those who would rather spend that time tearing down our Republic.
    Imagine employees, (They work for us) spending three years trying to tear down a great company which pays their salary. Spending not
    one single minute doing the job they were paid for. It is the same thing. We need to quote President Trump and tell them, “You’re Fired”!!!
    As Patriots, we need to get this done. Vote them out! Once the “Minute Men” are called up, it will be too late! MAGA & KAG! Trump 2020

  12. Repsychler 808
    January 26, 2020 @ 1:37 pm

    According to the Democrats the Mueller report don’t mean jack. A total waste of time and $.
    Their own proof isn’t good enough. Un… beievable!

  13. jerry graeber
    January 26, 2020 @ 1:44 pm

    Pelosi Schumer and Adam have lied to the American people over and over how do feel now

  14. Mary Thompson
    January 26, 2020 @ 1:51 pm

    I would like to agree with the previous comment, but why do I feel that a dictator sip where the ppls wishs are completely overlooked are coming instead of a God-fearing Leader who has accomplished more in 3 years than all the 8 years of Presidential Leadership
    before him?

    • trafficjon400
      January 27, 2020 @ 1:05 am

      Sure he fears God”. seems to fear nothing. but may be that is how one is when fearing God”, any thing else should be a walk in the park. Hard to tell when many who appear to this seem to fear more.

  15. Alon Kaplan
    January 26, 2020 @ 2:08 pm

    Our POTUS is President Donald Trump. I am skeptical agnostic atheist. I’m a small business owner. I had a disability. I am a Pro-Choice supporter. I am a Jewish-American and a Zionist. I have Democrat family and lefties friends. The Democrat leaders were corrupt & liars; planting a false narratives unto the American public and psychological projection unto themselves. The core Democrats are Nancy, Biden, Hilary, Kerry and Obama. What do they’re hiding in-plain-view? (It has to do with Ukraine, China and Jeffery Epstein’s island).

  16. Nils Telle
    January 26, 2020 @ 9:58 pm

    America the greatest cover up in the history from the beginning of the USA after the writing of the American constitution and the established nation called America,

  17. JM Jm
    January 26, 2020 @ 11:18 pm

    They are jealous of Donald Trump the President success and should be charged! Jail maybe 😅

  18. trafficjon400
    January 26, 2020 @ 11:49 pm

    I’ sure that People out in this Country are wise And smart enough to sense the high rollers are pulling the wool over the eye’s. if not then passing any thing Good or Bad in Senate /Democrats /Republican would not Last or pull through . other wise Good luck in America.

  19. trafficjon400
    January 26, 2020 @ 11:59 pm

    Opinions opinions opinions ‘. Seem to be the best answer of all truth in the Comment’s section of all Fox videos and any other”. against or with, in the past and through the entire Impeachment.

  20. Ana Sangsang
    January 27, 2020 @ 1:07 am

    I listened to the defense team and thoroughly enjoyed how they eviscerated the democrats straight in your face manufactured hyperbolic lies with facts.

  21. Austin Cox
    January 27, 2020 @ 7:55 am

    Play only what you want people to see, we the people are sick of your biased news!!!!

  22. Tye Lee
    January 27, 2020 @ 10:16 am

    Collins you’re on House team, tell them to put videos up on there witnesses, and show where you asked all of them do they have any knowledge or evidence where the President committed any wrong doing, plus the transcript of the call. That should be the end of there case. Please do that an hammer that out. All the Democrat are telling a good story of what they wish or hoping happen, nothing more. Senate just need to look at the Democrats own witnesses and the case should be over. Don’t rely own what they wish had happen. They brought articles of impeachment to the Senate without any facts, that shouldn’t be accepted. If they are allowed to impeach a President with a thought then any President can be impeached from then on. Senate, if this is acceptable then be prepared for more impeachment’s. Please let the Democrats know there articles are unacceptable. What the Democrats are saying is we can think the facts and we can go forward with articles of impeachment.

  23. Tik Tok Compilation
    January 27, 2020 @ 10:51 am


  24. Carmen Nicholson
    January 27, 2020 @ 1:13 pm

    Replying to your presumption though & to your concerns & calling me using the crown 👑 to be indicated that i see him to be a king❗Certainly his executive title it’s indicative that hi’s & surely that’s his rightful title he hold as the highest position in our land❗However, I was not referring about a “human” king👑that it so offended you, because of your hate & political bitter bise against this president❗I will not continue to engaged with such pettyful uncivil misconceptions of your lefties minded behaviors❗

  25. Robert Forrester
    January 27, 2020 @ 5:28 pm

    The President’s defense team just lost. The smug and arrogant Jane Raskin, (does anyone have a bobby pin), just blew it for them. Watch her footage again. And Miss Bondi’s performance was par for her course . . . which is to say she should not be there.

  26. ronald rusin
    January 27, 2020 @ 7:04 pm

    Nothing but deflection to the Bidens! No defense facts offered to prove Trumpty Dumpty is innocent!!! Bring on Bolton and the rest of Trumpty Dumpty’s staff as witnesses!!! This will be over immediately!! Wake the hell up America!!!!

  27. Benjamin Falzon
    January 27, 2020 @ 7:51 pm

    If the majority of the American people know what’s good for them and their country, they must rebel against the Democrats…Note the last 4-words in “Democrats”…Rats.

  28. Richard Hudak
    January 27, 2020 @ 10:23 pm


  29. Trudy Hoang
    January 27, 2020 @ 11:20 pm

    It has and is all about over turning the votes and our duly elected. President, thus making the USA voters they bytches now is that what our country has become? Is that what the voters are?

  30. Blair Fraser
    January 27, 2020 @ 11:58 pm

    The facts haven’t been refuted, yet the Defense Team simply said “it’s not a crime, you didn’t prove it, this cost too much money…and what about the Whisleblower and the Biden’s!”…I’m surprised their argument wasn’t simply; “Squirrel!”

  31. tom my
    January 28, 2020 @ 11:47 am

    Defend Donald strategy —-  Throw red herrings, red meat, and black lies against the wall.  Hope something will stick.

  32. use the force
    January 28, 2020 @ 3:49 pm

    we will give you the facts today( but no witness)
    This is the first impeachment trial without evidence and witness, that is the FACT!

    • Old Yeller
      January 30, 2020 @ 9:48 pm

      The Dems want NEW witnesses. They are supposed to interview witnesses in the HOUSE, not in the SENATE.
      That would be like a prosecutor going to trial, with “surprise witnesses” that the defense had not yet been allowed to interview, or vice versa.
      YOU need to educate yourself.
      There IS a process, if the Dems wanted Bolton, they should have asked for Bolton. If the POTUS says “No” for reasons of privileged information,
      then the Dems take it to The Supreme Court, where a decision will be made. The Dems didn’t want to do that, because THEY SAID, it would take too long.
      Then after they voted, and NOT ONE of the witnesses said Trump had committed an impeachable offense, Pelosi held onto The Articles of Impeachment for a month!!
      What happened to the urgency of then situation Nancy?? You had plenty of time to take it to The Supreme Court, but you didn’t want to wait.
      As for the witnesses, you can HAVE them, the Republicans have said as much, but what YOU don’t seem to understand is, THEY will ALSO call witnesses.
      Are you READY for Hunter Biden to testify about Burisma?
      Are you READY for Quid Pro Joe to testify about his BRIBE making Ukraine FIRE the prosecutor Obama didn’t like?
      WE HAVE THAT ON TAPE!!! IT IS CLEARLY BRIBERY. Ready for THAT??? The Dems clearly don’t want THEM to testify.
      What about Obama? Let’s get HIM in the HOT SEAT.
      And Hillary as well. Let’s charge HER with OBSTRUCTION for DELETING those 3,500 emails.
      Seriously…can’t wait to see ALL of them…go to PRISON. I HOPE you are also ready for that.

  33. LarJgrip
    January 29, 2020 @ 10:19 am

    These highlights are misrepresentative, I know that because I watched the actual presentation. The defense actually dismantled the house managers’ case and then ragdolled them. Truthfully it wasn’t even almost close. Can’t wait for the question period.

  34. Afri Media
    January 29, 2020 @ 12:25 pm

    What a shame !!! Trumpists , white evangelicals and white republicans are some of the most heinously corrupt people on the planet! Just what would it take to dump trump?

  35. Norma Tukay
    January 30, 2020 @ 2:24 pm

    presidents legal teams can speak fluently without notes and democratic senators ask questions to democratic reps

  36. jr rivas
    January 30, 2020 @ 3:26 pm

    According to the interview done by Rachel Maddow, Les Parnas made a public statement that “Jay Sekulow” was in Donald J. Trumps Orbit of people who was fully aware of the Scheme to hold back funds from Ukraine and Smear the Bidens, along with Vice President Mike Pence and Attorney General William Low-Barr or William Barr. So how is it possible to defend Donald J. Trump; Mr. Sekulow when you are tarnished by the Scheme itself. You are the Epitome of a Two Face low down Traitor, Not worthy of holding a Political office or Post in the United States of America….Traitor …. Two Face…. Liar…. How can you be part of the Defense when you are a part of the Corruption?

  37. Greco Veritas
    January 30, 2020 @ 3:38 pm

    What its all about is the Jews want  the US and UK to go to war with Iran, The Jews

  38. Old Yeller
    January 30, 2020 @ 9:36 pm

    Go ahead and rip up the ballots. We will just WRITE TRUMP’S NAME ON EVERY BALLOT!!!