29 Comments

  1. Cheryl Bazemore
    February 16, 2020 @ 2:42 pm

    Wrong is something America knows alot about. Both parties are corrupt. Look at dump getting away with everything and giving the silent middle finger to his Base

  2. Alvin Learning
    February 16, 2020 @ 2:53 pm

    Still waiting for my 50Grand from Bloomberg for my vote. Didn’t get it yet. Now it’s 100Grand. He can pay the rest of you the 50Grand if you all will settle for that. He has to buy it, to win it people.

  3. Kate Gainer
    February 16, 2020 @ 3:01 pm

    Donald Trump is a racist who is so corrupt we need a new president for 2020

  4. Zachary Fluke
    February 16, 2020 @ 3:04 pm

    Even trump knows how bad Bloomberg would be for us. And if Bloomberg takes the nomination from Bernie, the destruction of the party will follow. Our entire two party system will collapse.

    And another thing Trump knows, is that he really doesn’t want to run against Bernie. In his own words, he admitted that whether you love him or hate him, Bernie has a movement that rivals his own, and even Trump is politically savvy enough to know that (as opposed to the Democratic establishment and MSNBC).

  5. Rômulo Fiúza e Mello
    February 16, 2020 @ 3:05 pm

    I know Bloomberg bought everyone including the DNC. But makes zero sense keep a person who is almost in second in the national pools out of the debates.

  6. S Z
    February 16, 2020 @ 3:16 pm

    Rules are made to he changed.
    Rules are broken every day by the current administration. So YES!
    Change the rules. It’s for the better.

  7. jpcyphers
    February 16, 2020 @ 3:17 pm

    For Trump to call Bloomberg a loser, when Bloomberg has billions more than Trump has is hilarious.

  8. B. Young
    February 16, 2020 @ 4:25 pm

    Big deal the man is 5’4. I am quiet sure if women in the world had a choice between big fat stupid Trump and slim intelligent Bloomberg they will all choose Bloomberg including Melania.
    Bloomberg has a brain.
    Trump is a proven psycho imbecile.

  9. Denis Logan
    February 16, 2020 @ 4:30 pm

    If Bloomberg loses the nomination he says he will give the candidate his machine. That would be much better than Bernie, it took forever to concede to Hillary. After BS was defeated, he continued to slander her. Just an angry ole Independent Politition.

  10. Nicole Rice
    February 16, 2020 @ 5:09 pm

    That was an incredible video, who is on who’s side ?
    Ppl are being blown away by mike Bloomberg,
    Mr Bloomberg is super smart, and he is campaigning
    through his ads, it’s really quite ingenious, the main media
    it’s what sticks in ppl’s heads, quick and to the point
    Who has time today to get the full story ?

  11. Wake UP. America
    February 16, 2020 @ 5:31 pm

    Bloomberg Needs a Reminder
    He needs to be reminded that if every Jewish family in Germany & Poland had owned a Mauser rifle, 20 rounds of ammunition and the WILL to use it, Hitler would have been a little-known footnote to the history of the Weimar Republic.

  12. Sandra Walker
    February 16, 2020 @ 6:23 pm

    Is Bloomberg buying the race? DCCC backed candidate becomes Republican •Dec 16, 2019

    Krystal Ball: Bloomberg’s $100 million ad buy is class warfare •Dec 12, 2019

  13. Sandra Walker
    February 16, 2020 @ 6:28 pm

    CNN Attacks Benjamin Dixon For Unmasking Michael Bloomberg Feb 11, 2020

    Meet the Journalist Who Exposed Bloomberg’s Racist Defense of Targeting Black & Brown Youth •Feb 12, 2020

    Trump & Bloomberg Have A LOT In Common •Feb 14, 2020 ps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46nmfvWDtKs

  14. Sandra Walker
    February 16, 2020 @ 6:34 pm

    History Says Bloomberg 2020 Would Be a Sure Loser
    Almost every four years, there’s a last-minute panic candidate for the presidency. They never win.

    By JEFF GREENFIELD – November 11, 2019 Jeff Greenfield is a five-time Emmy winning network television analyst and author

  15. Jay Vee
    February 16, 2020 @ 6:41 pm

    As a Republican it’s ok and actually great that mini mike not call himself a GOPr. We dont like him, never did and he doesn’t belong at all great riddance.

  16. Jay Vee
    February 16, 2020 @ 6:42 pm

    Democrats are racist. They had about a billion non whites running and they got killed lol

  17. Sandra Walker
    February 16, 2020 @ 6:49 pm

    Democrats Aren’t Moving Left. They’re Returning to Their Roots.

    Many on both sides are worried about the party’s leftward swing. They say it’s a
    deviation from the mainstream. It’s not.  By JOSHUA ZEITZ  November 04, 2018

    Joshua Zeitz, a Politico Magazine contributing editor, is the author of Building the Great Society: Inside Lyndon Johnson’s White House, which will be released on January 30. Follow him @joshuamzeitz.

    excerpt from article
    ” Be advised: “Democrats are in danger of going too far left in 2018.” So warn Republicans like Mitt Romney and ex-Democrats like Joe Lieberman and public personae as diverse as James Comey and Howard Schultz.

    In recent months, the pundit class has determined that the party’s leftward lurch heralds the rise of a “liberal tea party”—a movement that could very well unmoor Democrats from their longstanding
    center-left traditions, in close imitation of the spiral of events that caused the Republican Party to turn sharply to the right in recent years.

    What’s fueling this argument? For one, more Democrats have rallied, either noisily or cautiously, around such policy innovations as “Medicare for all,” universal college and a universal basic income. That a smattering of Democratic candidates have elected to call themselves “democratic socialists” has only
    fueled the claim that such programs are “socialist.” “The center is Harry Truman and Daniel Patrick Moynihan, not Eugene Debs and Michael Harrington,” warned New York Times opinion columnist Bret Stephens recently. (Debs and Harrington were self-identified socialists.)

    But there’s something wrong with this historical interpretation: Truman strongly supported single-payer health care. Moynihan supported a universal basic income in the 1960s. Dating back to World War II, Democrats sought to make a government-paid education available to as many Americans as possible.

    If Democrats are marching to the left, that road leads directly back to platforms and politicians who, in their day, commanded wide support and existed firmly in the mainstream of political thought.

    What’s more, to label these programs “socialist”—which is to say, far outside the center of the
    political spectrum—reveals a constrained worldview.

    For over six decades, center-right parties in Europe—in Britain and France, Germany and Austria, and
    almost everywhere between—have either participated in or acceded to the very same policies.

    In a remarkable way, today’s debate today strongly resembles a broader discussion that occurred in the United States and Europe in the 1940s, amid wartime mobilization and economic reconstruction, and
    in the decades following

    It’s perfectly reasonable to dispute the progressive agenda on its merits. There are strong policy arguments running in both directions. But to argue that it breaks with the party’s roots, or that it falls dangerously outside the mainstream, is ahistorical.

    What pundits today decry as a radical turn in Democratic policy and politics actually finds its
    antecedents in 1944. With the country fully mobilized for war, President Franklin Roosevelt called for “a second Bill of Rights … an economic bill of rights” that would entitle all Americans to a “useful and remunerative job,” “the right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation,” the “right … to a decent home,” “the right to adequate medical care” and the “right to a good education.” His speech found partial inspiration in a report by the National Resource Planning Board, which

    advanced the necessity of a “socially provided income.” “

  18. 3pharaohstowers
    February 16, 2020 @ 7:46 pm

    Bloomberg trump and dnc are traitors all support and funds to them in election or office are illegal and void. You follow the law or lose your corrupt bribery and tainted benefits and get banned from all politics.

  19. Kevin Brown
    February 16, 2020 @ 8:12 pm

    What if Mike wins the nomination without one debate? Would anyone want his first debate to be against the president? The rule change is not about fairness, it is about vetting the best candidate isn’t it. Those candidates that dropped out have to face the fact that there was not enough support for there candidacy. Those that are still in need to stop worrying about who gets in just run a better race.

  20. TheAnnArnold
    February 16, 2020 @ 9:08 pm

    Dont most us get up to go potty or get food during commercials? I do. I block out commercials & have never bought anything because of a commercial.🤷🏻‍♀️

  21. watches777
    February 16, 2020 @ 9:51 pm

    I have no problem with changing rules to allow #3 candidate to debate. May the best candidate win.

  22. watches777
    February 16, 2020 @ 9:59 pm

    The rule keeping Bloomberg out of debates served no one. Why should a billionaire take money from working people to fund a campaign when that billionaire can fund it himself? Why keep the #3 polling candidate out of debates so that voters can see how he measures up?

  23. TheBlazersfan22
    February 16, 2020 @ 10:06 pm

    Who ever votes for bloomberg and gets him elected. You are seriously stupid unless you are mega wealthy and you deserve trump for another 4 more years . from someone who cant vote but knows voting for bloomberg is absolutely unless you make a crap load of money like he does.

    • TheBlazersfan22
      February 16, 2020 @ 10:07 pm

      Voting for bloomberg is absolutely stupid . on my phone . not best thing to message on.

  24. Tiffany Powers
    February 16, 2020 @ 11:01 pm

    I’m no Bloomberg fan. He’s not worse than trump. At least he’s using his own money and not being a bought GOP politician who are beholden to their donors and NOT the constituents.

  25. Timothy Moore
    February 16, 2020 @ 11:29 pm

    Bloomberg is Palpatine, Trump is Jar Jar Binks. I think Jar Jar needs to watch his mouth.

  26. Sammy Chamba
    February 17, 2020 @ 1:29 am

    Americans wake up money doesn’t give you the right leaders, as you now, hopelessly sit by watching you country being led by mediocre people constantly wanting to remain in the WH and get into politics to make more for themselves and their families. Today’s America has become a monarchy sons, daughters, in-laws and friends conduct foreign policy and transact major trade deals. Shame.

  27. Sirvan Homa
    February 17, 2020 @ 2:13 am

    When Dems learn how to fight? Bloomberg is the only chance to defeat corrupted GOP and Trump administration? When they learn to play politics? Gun fight needs a gun not a tiny pocket knife such as Amy or Elizabeth or Pete

  28. Elf Kind
    February 17, 2020 @ 2:57 am

    HEY MIKE, TURN ON THE COMMENTS ON YOUR ADS! Millions a day on ads. THAT COUND HELP A LOT OF PEOPLE! The cool candidate is only in it for himself!